Looking for Blasters

[Paciify]

I worried of taking my cps 1200 apart. I might break it... Also, i measured it with a tape measure and got 40 feet with 22 pumps. I might have done something wrong.

[HBWW]

Uhh, CA99, the 4100 and Monster 2001 have slightly less power, range, size, and shot time than a 1500/1700. I would suggest putting them in the same group as the 1500/1700.

Perhaps the MX shouldn't be in the same group if it performs a lo better than the Monster and 4100. As for those 2, I guess I didn't give an ideal name for their category and just need to re-order things. They definitely don't belong in the 1500 group due to form factor, design, and PC size differences, IMO.

[isoaker]

IMO, the 2001Monster and CPS4100 are more akin to a CPS1000 with a nozzle selector than to a CPS1500.

[HBWW]

I'd say they're more akin to the 2100 with added length, capacity, and selector, but the 2100 was built to share some of the same design elements anyway. I still group the 2100 differently though. Perhaps I just have an oddly better impression of cylindrical chambers over spherical to call them "light cannons", l guess I might update that later.

[Nemesis]

I personally hve found in actual testing that the cps 4100 has inferior range and power to the 1500/1700, but they are close. I consider guns with similar output and range to be in the same category, regardless of chamber shape, and in this case they are similar sizes too. But, to each, his own.

[HBWW]

The chamber shape results in very different form factors, and influences capacity/length. I think 1500/1700 definitely belong with 2700 than 4100 when looking at both performance and feel. The tracked vs free pump, the length and general shape of the blaster, etc. are also factors.

Like I said, just need to rename the category and move a few things around.

Light and Fast: CPS 1000, 1200, 2100
Light with a Kick: Monster, CPS 4100.
High Capacity Medium-Hitters: CPS 1500/1700, 2700
Medium with a Kick: Monster X
Heavy-Hitters: CPS 2000, 2500
Backpacks: CPS 3000, 3200, SS 300

I guess everyone would group CPS's differently, but I wanted to avoid doing so only by performance/output.