Something queer... - about the EES sonic review

Discussions of all varieties of stock water guns and water blasters.
Post Reply
User avatar
vaporizer
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: Michigan

Post by vaporizer » Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:06 am

I was browsing the piston style blasters on this site, and I came across the EES sonic review. I saw 2 things possibly wrong with it(typos).

1. It said the nozzle was -1.0

2. It said for the power, weight, and capacity, as well as overall = 7


I know that the EES line sucks, but this is cruel... :p

EDEIT: Fixed one of my typos.



Edited By vaporizer on 1112278079
My Armory:
2 MD2K
1 MD3K
1 MD5K
1 Vaporizer
1 XPsed 270 (balloons blew out, and fixed it w. a rubber band)
2 WW Glow- Blasters
1 Spider-Man soaker
1 Flash Flood
1 Triple Shot
1 Gremlin

Coming Soon
Aquapack Devastator
Liquidator

Edited by vaporizer on April 01 2005, 13:10
Top
User avatar
isoaker
Posts: 7115
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 1:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere
Contact:
Contact isoaker

Post by isoaker » Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:49 am

vaporizer wrote:I was browsing the piston style blasters on this site, and I came across the EES sonic review. I saw 2 things possibly wrong with it(typos).

1. It said the nozzle was -1.0

2. It said for the power, weight, and capacity, as well as overall = 7


I know that the EES line sucks, but this is cruel... :p

EDEIT: Fixed one of my typos.
hehe... that's no typo, that's a misread. It's not "-1x", it's "~1x" or roughly equivalent to 1x. Being piston-based, I can't quite do true output measurements since output really depends on how hard one can compress the piston in this case.

:cool:
:: Leave NO one dry! :: iSoaker.com .:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Water Blasters”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests