Not really sure what you are talking aboutatvan wrote:The problem with a large capacity springer is that the capacity comes from the small capacity.

Not really sure what you are talking aboutatvan wrote:The problem with a large capacity springer is that the capacity comes from the small capacity.
I'm not sure what's funnier... this, or the quotes in my signatureatvan wrote:The problem with a large capacity springer is that the capacity comes from the small capacity.
SEAL wrote:If you ain't bloody and muddy by the end of the day, you went to a Nerf war.
DX wrote:In the neanderthal days of K-modding, people would lop off the whole PRV
Beware the PurpleWell, not that much soakage.
as for the blasters themselves, i think you're just better off trying to do the opposite of what nerfers do; making nerf blasters into water blasters.overall, i'd perfer the mk. 1 over the mk. 1
DX wrote:In the neanderthal days of K-modding, people would lop off the whole PRV
Beware the PurpleWell, not that much soakage.
It's not even a joke...I attached a reservoir to a PAS, PPP style and it is easily capable of shooting more than 30 ft. However, being a springer, it couldn't produce a stream, only bursts. That and the plunger was designed to move air - hence it leaks water dreadfully despite having a vacuum-loading seal with darts.as for the blasters themselves, i think you're just better off trying to do the opposite of what nerfers do; making nerf blasters into water blasters.
marauder wrote:You have to explain things in terms that kids will understand, like videogames^ That's how I got Sam to stop using piston pumpers
marauder wrote:You have to explain things in terms that kids will understand, like videogames^ That's how I got Sam to stop using piston pumpers
SEAL wrote:If you ain't bloody and muddy by the end of the day, you went to a Nerf war.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests