Concept: CPS2000X
Concept: CPS2000X
Of course, being able to push this much water so quickly, this blaster would optimally also be able to hook up to a backpack reservoir like the CPS3200's backpack, but I still wanted the design to be fully functional on its own.
...and you KNOW you'd buy *TWO* of these if they ever actually got made.
:: Leave NO one dry! :: iSoaker.com .:
Re: Concept: CPS2000X
I'd have put a 2500 on the bottom with a riot blast nozzle too.
DX wrote:In the neanderthal days of K-modding, people would lop off the whole PRV
Beware the PurpleWell, not that much soakage.
Re: Concept: CPS2000X
Yeah, I was thinking go for one single large nozzle, and one selector for smaller nozzles. I wouldn't say there's call for a riot blast though, the 2000's regular nozzle will drench anything.
Over-under is probably more ergonomic, but personally I think the MXLs side-by-side six-way selectors make for maximum intimidation factor.
Aren't there problems with feeding dual CPS chambers by a single pump?
Over-under is probably more ergonomic, but personally I think the MXLs side-by-side six-way selectors make for maximum intimidation factor.
Aren't there problems with feeding dual CPS chambers by a single pump?
Re: Concept: CPS2000X
True in that the side-by-side design of the MXL adds to its intimidation faction (as well as its bipod). However, the MXL is fed by a single pump, though one can argue that the dual-PCs on the MXL act like a single one. I figure, with the right check and PRV valves in place, there really shouldn't be a problem. The pump will push into whichever CPS chamber offers the least resistance. If one chamber is full and one mostly empty, the pump will end up pushing water into the emptier one. If someone pumps too quickly, it would, at worst, end up activating a PRV and simply end up recycling the water into the reservoir.cantab wrote:Yeah, I was thinking go for one single large nozzle, and one selector for smaller nozzles. I wouldn't say there's call for a riot blast though, the 2000's regular nozzle will drench anything.
Over-under is probably more ergonomic, but personally I think the MXLs side-by-side six-way selectors make for maximum intimidation factor.
Aren't there problems with feeding dual CPS chambers by a single pump?
:: Leave NO one dry! :: iSoaker.com .:
Re: Concept: CPS2000X
I always thought the MXL actually had a single PC, but a check of your internals pictures reveals it does indeed have two.
Re: Concept: CPS2000X
The pump would need 4 check valves here, which would raise the price.
DX wrote:In the neanderthal days of K-modding, people would lop off the whole PRV
Beware the PurpleWell, not that much soakage.
Re: Concept: CPS2000X
Then they should have PRV's like with 2000s. You can't pump them too fast, period.If someone pumps too quickly, it would, at worst, end up activating a PRV and simply end up recycling the water into the reservoir.
marauder wrote:You have to explain things in terms that kids will understand, like videogames^ That's how I got Sam to stop using piston pumpers
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests