WaterWar.net

Well, a basic idea would be to have one or more pressurized blasters inside, that had a lever attached to the trigger(s) and the lid of the box that would be opened... Perhaps there would be an easier way to get the trigger to stay depressed... hmmm.

Is that water weld i see?

Burn to the burn.

List based on experience with blaster, (if applicable) and others' lists, 1. CPS 3000/3200 2. XP 150 (Very Underrated) 3. CPS 2700 4. CPS 1000 5. CPS 1700 6. CPS 1500 7. CPS 1200 8. Shield blaster 2000 (fires non-stop, very noob friendly. 9. One's own bladder 10. Colossus 11. Python 2 12. Outlaw 13....

One of the best original descriptions i've seen.

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Duxburian!!!!! 3000th post!!!!!

Whoa! please do explain.

Hahaha, I would be so angry at The Wise Water Warrior of the Mountain.

Interesting. Perhaps, if one had a 1-3-5 and a 1500, you could switch the firing mechanisms, the PCs, and possibly the pumps to get one gun with the best of both worlds. The by product would be an equivalent to a more fragile 1-3-5 with less capacity that looks like a 1500. Then again, it may not be...

OMG!! u r so luky!!!

lol aquazone.

@storm: a 2700 you say? and why is that?

@Darthmeow: awesome. If you have another spherical PC CPS perhaps you could try an integration. Who knows, one of the smaller spherical PCs could give it more PC capacity as well as range.

My parents do this all the time and i couldn't sympathize more with your plight.

Ooh! how does it perform!!!? Sorry, I had to be the one to ask.

lol aquazone.

Wow, those vids are sweet! I especially like the 2000 vs the 2500! You have a ton of Cps.

Yeah thats true. Well I may obtain it we'll see.

Lol. Interesting! Sounds like this could possibly be a smaller version of the colossus with better nozzles. I'll probably have to pick this one up!

Oh whoops, well I suppose it's funny either way. Sorry.

Could those nozzles be found at a hardware store? It's calculating way more shipping cost that i would prefer.

yes but it's about a 5x size aperture.... we need new names for nozzle sizes, instead of using output measures.