yup thats right pincer defense - uh-huh

General questions and discussions on water warfare regarding tactics and strategies.
Post Reply
User avatar
Triforce Elite
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 12:35 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by Triforce Elite » Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:41 pm

pincer defence can be explained like this
:cps2000: :cps3000: :cps1000: :cps2500:
back 2 back 1 take on 1 very simple :D




Edited By Triforce Elite on 1114847565
you know those really annoying people? don't you just feel like soaking them?:cps1500:

User avatar
isoaker
Posts: 7115
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 1:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere
Contact:

Post by isoaker » Sat Apr 30, 2005 8:27 am

Well, I'll give you a nod for creatively using smileys to denote a particular battle formation, but the length of the post does not make it an article-length tips & tactics post.

Thread moved

:cool:
:: Leave NO one dry! :: iSoaker.com .:

Belisaurius
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 4:20 pm
Location: Baltimore
WWN League Team: Havoc
Contact:

Post by Belisaurius » Sat Apr 30, 2005 10:50 am

I think one of the flaws of this formation is that water balloons could be used to rain down on the people back to back and they wouldn't be able to spread out and avoid it. Also, the people in the center are cut off from supplies and the attackers are not. Even without water balloons, some high trajectory fire from the attackers could force the people in the center to move in order to not be hit, and in moving not to be hit to be hit by the people firing straight on.

User avatar
Adrian
Posts: 1387
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:05 pm
Location: WI, USA
Contact:

Post by Adrian » Sat Apr 30, 2005 11:05 am

It's never a good idea to concentrate your forces or get backed into a situation where you have enemies on all sides. You should always have an escape route or three if possible. If you've gotten to a point where you have to fight defensively back to back - you're in duck soup.

Adrian
“To achieve a World Government it is necessary to remove from their minds their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogma.”…..Brock Adams, Director, United Nations Health Organisation.

User avatar
cooldood31
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 9:02 am
Contact:

Post by cooldood31 » Sat Apr 30, 2005 8:01 pm

Having cover and escape routes is far better than havin a buddy to your back, because escape routes don't run out of water, and cover such as trees don't dodge and let you take all the hits. And for the last time, cut it out with the smileys!

User avatar
Triforce Elite
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 12:35 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by Triforce Elite » Sat Apr 30, 2005 8:20 pm

however 2 on 2 would be effective...
you know those really annoying people? don't you just feel like soaking them?:cps1500:

DX
Posts: 3495
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 8:35 am
Contact:

Post by DX » Sat Apr 30, 2005 10:02 pm

That tactic has only been used effectively once in military history, or at least that I can think of. In water warfare, going back to back takes away your ability to move and dodge. You actually probably have a better chance fighting with your back against a wall. :laugh:
marauder wrote:You have to explain things in terms that kids will understand, like videogames^ That's how I got Sam to stop using piston pumpers

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests